The tricky part isn't the happy path, it's all the stuff you have to ask before writing a single line.
Start by clarifying the requirements: the path syntax, the sentinel value, and edge cases like empty paths or invalid characters. Then, design a parser that tokenizes the path into keys and indices, and a traversal function that iterates through the tokens, checking at each step if the current value is a map or array and if the key/index exists. Finally, discuss trade-offs between iterative and recursive approaches, and consider performance and error handling.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a sentinel object (e.g., a unique symbol or a constant) to distinguish between a missing path and a legitimate undefined/null value, and discuss how this design choice affects API usability and error handling.
Ask about the path syntax, expected data types, sentinel value, and how to handle invalid paths or missing segments. Confirm whether the function should throw errors or return the sentinel.
Outline a tokenizer that splits the path into segments: property names (e.g., 'ab') and array indices (e.g., '[1]'). Consider using regular expressions or a state machine to handle nested brackets and dots.
Describe an iterative loop over tokens: for each token, check if the current value is an object/array and if the token exists. If not, return the sentinel. Update the current value accordingly.
Discuss handling empty paths, leading/trailing dots, consecutive brackets, and non-existent keys. Consider performance optimizations like early termination and avoiding unnecessary parsing.
Walk through test cases: valid paths, missing segments, invalid syntax, and edge cases like empty objects/arrays. Explain how you would verify correctness and handle errors.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.