← Akuna Capital Interview Insights
I knew the ring buffer mechanics well enough but tripped up when they asked me to commit to a policy for full-buffer pushes and actually document it.
Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases (e.g., full buffer behavior), then implement the core circular buffer with head, tail, and size using modulo arithmetic. After ensuring O(1) operations and iteration, discuss thread-safety using mutex and condition variables for blocking push/pop. Emphasize trade-offs and design choices throughout.
Pro tip: Explicitly state your assumption for full-buffer push (e.g., overwrite oldest or throw exception) and justify it based on use case; this shows you think about real-world constraints and API design.
Ask about the expected behavior when pushing to a full buffer (overwrite, block, or error) and whether iteration should be thread-safe. Confirm that all operations must be O(1) and discuss initial capacity handling.
Use a fixed-size array with head (read index), tail (write index), and size (or count) variables. Explain how modulo arithmetic enables wrap-around and maintains O(1) for push, pop, peek, isEmpty, isFull, and size.
Describe how to iterate from head to tail using modulo indexing, ensuring elements are visited in FIFO order. Mention that iteration is O(n) but each step is O(1).
Introduce a mutex to protect shared state and condition variables (not_empty, not_full) to block push when full and pop when empty. Explain how to signal/wait to avoid busy-waiting and ensure correctness.
Compare overwrite vs. block vs. error on full push, and mention alternative implementations (e.g., linked list) and their trade-offs. Highlight that the array-based approach gives O(1) operations and cache efficiency.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.