The setup sounds like a physics problem but it's really a probability derivation.
Set up the geometry with the light source at the origin and the screen as a vertical line at distance d. Express the x-coordinate of impact as d * tan(θ), where θ is the angle from the perpendicular. Since θ is uniform, derive the probability density function of X using the transformation of variables, showing it matches the Cauchy distribution.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the heavy tails of the Cauchy distribution arise because angles near ±π/2 produce extremely large x-coordinates, and mention that the mean and variance are undefined, which is a key property.
Place the point light source at the origin and the infinite vertical screen at x = d (or y = d). Let θ be the angle of emission relative to the perpendicular, uniformly distributed over (-π/2, π/2).
Using trigonometry, the x-coordinate of impact is X = d * tan(θ). Note that θ is uniform, so its probability density function is constant over the interval.
Use the formula for the density of a transformed random variable: f_X(x) = f_θ(θ) * |dθ/dx|. Compute the derivative dθ/dx = d / (d^2 + x^2).
Substitute the uniform density and the derivative to obtain f_X(x) = 1/(π d) * 1/(1 + (x/d)^2), which is the Cauchy distribution with location 0 and scale d.
Highlight that the Cauchy distribution has heavy tails, no defined mean or variance, and that this arises because angles near ±π/2 map to very large |x| values.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
First, clearly state the mathematical derivation: for a point source emitting particles uniformly in angle, the impact x-coordinate on a screen follows a Cauchy distribution. Then, outline a numerical simulation plan: sample angles uniformly, compute x = d * tan(θ), and generate a histogram. Finally, compare the histogram to the theoretical Cauchy PDF, using appropriate visualization and statistical measures to verify agreement.
Pro tip: Mention that the Cauchy distribution has heavy tails, so the sample mean and variance are undefined; use robust statistics like median and interquartile range for comparison, and consider log-scale plots to visualize the tails.
Show that if θ ~ Uniform(-π/2, π/2), then x = d * tan(θ) follows a Cauchy distribution with location 0 and scale d. Derive the PDF using the transformation of variables.
Choose the number of samples N (e.g., 10^5), the screen distance d, and the random number generator. Sample angles uniformly from (-π/2, π/2) and compute x = d * tan(θ).
Plot a histogram of the simulated x values with appropriate binning. Overlay the theoretical Cauchy PDF for comparison. Use a log-scale on the y-axis to better see the tails.
Compute summary statistics (e.g., median, interquartile range) and perform a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test or compare quantiles to assess the goodness of fit.
Acknowledge that the Cauchy distribution has undefined mean and variance, so avoid using those. Suggest extensions like varying d, adding noise, or considering finite screen size.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.