← Anthropic Interview Insights
I started with the obvious stuff, thread pool, a shared visited set, a work queue.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a design using a thread-safe queue and a concurrent set for visited URLs. Explain the synchronization strategy (e.g., locks, atomics) and how to detect completion and shut down cleanly. Finally, discuss trade-offs and potential improvements.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of backpressure and politeness policies (e.g., rate limiting per host) to show you consider real-world crawling constraints beyond just parallelism.
Ask about scale, expected page count, depth limits, politeness (robots.txt, rate limiting), and whether the interface is thread-safe. Confirm that only same-host URLs should be crawled.
Use a thread-safe queue (e.g., LinkedBlockingQueue) for URLs to crawl and a concurrent set (e.g., ConcurrentHashMap.newKeySet()) for visited URLs. Ensure atomic check-and-add to avoid duplicates.
Create a fixed thread pool. Each worker loops: take URL from queue, fetch page, extract URLs, filter same-host, and for each new URL atomically add to visited and enqueue. Use a counter or active task count to track pending work.
Use a poison pill or a completion flag when the queue is empty and no active tasks. Ensure all threads terminate gracefully, possibly with a timeout. Discuss clean shutdown on error or interruption.
Mention trade-offs: thread pool size vs. context switching, lock contention, memory usage of visited set, and potential for distributed crawling. Suggest improvements like async I/O or partitioning by host.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.