The problem statement they gave me was weirdly vague.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then outline a modular pipeline with clear interfaces between sampling, annotation, training, and evaluation. Emphasize trade-offs (e.g., uncertainty vs. diversity sampling, batch size, retraining frequency) and discuss how you would measure success and iterate.
Pro tip: Propose a baseline first (e.g., random sampling) and then justify improvements with expected gains and costs. This shows pragmatism and helps you avoid over-engineering.
Ask about data volume, labeling budget, latency requirements, and evaluation metrics. Define success criteria and scope (e.g., single iteration vs. continuous loop).
Outline components: unlabeled pool, sampling strategy, annotation interface, training module, and evaluation. Define data flow and storage between stages.
Select a method (e.g., uncertainty sampling, diversity sampling, or hybrid) based on goals. Discuss how to balance exploration and exploitation.
Train a classifier on labeled data, using appropriate validation. Evaluate on a held-out test set and compare against baselines (e.g., random sampling).
Set up a loop to repeat sampling and training, monitoring performance and cost. Discuss when to stop and how to handle drift.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.