The two-pointer part came naturally but I completely forgot they also wanted the index back until I was halfway through explaining.
Use a two-pointer approach from both ends, and when a mismatch occurs, check if skipping either the left or right character yields a palindrome. Return true and the index to delete if so; otherwise return false. For Unicode or case-insensitive comparisons, normalize the string first (e.g., using Unicode normalization and case folding) and then apply the same algorithm.
Pro tip: Mention that you'd clarify the definition of 'character' (code unit vs. grapheme) and whether the index should refer to the original or normalized string, as this affects correctness and is a common pitfall in real-world Unicode handling.
Ask about input constraints, definition of character (Unicode code point vs. grapheme), case sensitivity, and whether the index should be in the original or normalized string. Discuss empty string, single character, and already palindrome cases.
If case-insensitive or Unicode normalization is required, apply appropriate transformations (e.g., toLowerCase, NFC/NFD) and keep a mapping to original indices if necessary.
Use two pointers (left, right) moving inward. On mismatch, check if the substring skipping left or skipping right is a palindrome. If either is, return true and the index to delete; otherwise return false.
If skipping left yields a palindrome, return the left index; if skipping right yields a palindrome, return the right index. If no deletion needed, return true and -1 (or null) to indicate no deletion.
Explain that the algorithm runs in O(n) time and O(1) extra space (ignoring normalization). Discuss trade-offs of normalizing (extra space/time) and handling Unicode correctly.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.