My first instinct was Dijkstra but that's for minimizing cost, not maximizing a mixed score-minus-cost objective.
Clarify the problem details, then propose a dynamic programming solution on the DAG that computes the maximum value to each node and reconstructs the path. Discuss complexity and edge cases, and compare with alternative approaches like topological sort with DP or modified Dijkstra.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the DAG property allows linear-time DP, and mention that if the graph were not a DAG, the problem would be NP-hard, showing you understand the importance of the constraint.
Ask clarifying questions about terminal node identification, score ranges, and whether negative scores are allowed. Restate the problem to ensure alignment.
Propose dynamic programming on the DAG: compute topological order, then for each node, compute the maximum value from start to that node. Alternatively, use a modified Dijkstra if edge costs are nonnegative but node scores can be negative.
Define dp[v] as the maximum value of a path from start to v. Initialize dp[start] = 0, others -inf. For each node in topological order, relax outgoing edges: dp[to] = max(dp[to], dp[from] + score[to] - cost(edge)).
Maintain a parent pointer for each node when updating dp. After computing dp for all terminals, find the terminal with max dp, then backtrack using parent pointers to get the path.
Analyze time and space complexity: O(V+E) time, O(V) space. Discuss handling unreachable terminals, multiple terminals, and negative values. Mention that if no terminal reachable, return appropriate message.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.