This one sprawled way more than I expected.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then present a clean data model and predicate abstraction that supports extensibility. Walk through a simple execution strategy (e.g., full scan with predicate pushdown) and discuss trade-offs, then outline how to add AND/OR, sorting, and projection via composable operators.
Pro tip: Emphasize that you'd start with a simple, correct implementation and then optimize based on profiling, showing you value pragmatism over premature optimization. Also, mention that you'd design the predicate interface to be easily serializable and composable, which is crucial for building complex queries.
Ask about data volume, query complexity, performance needs, and whether updates are needed. This shows you think before coding.
Propose a record structure (e.g., map or struct) and an interface for predicates with methods like evaluate(record). Discuss how to represent field comparisons and logical operators.
Describe a simple execution engine that iterates over records, applies predicates, and returns matches. Mention potential optimizations like indexing or predicate pushdown.
Explain how to compose predicates using composite patterns (e.g., AndPredicate, OrPredicate) and add sorting (e.g., comparator) and projection (e.g., field selection) as post-processing steps.
Talk about performance vs. simplicity, memory usage, and how you'd add features like joins or aggregation. This demonstrates foresight.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.