← Two Sigma Interview Insights
Took me a bit to stop thinking about this as a DP problem.
Model the problem as a greedy selection with a priority queue: at each step, among all projects whose capital requirement is ≤ current capital, pick the one with the highest profit. Sort projects by capital requirement and use a max-heap to efficiently retrieve the best available project, repeating up to k times.
Pro tip: Clarify edge cases upfront (e.g., no affordable projects, k=0, or multiple projects with same capital) and mention that the greedy choice is optimal because capital only increases, so a project affordable now remains affordable later. This shows you understand the exchange argument and can handle interviewer follow-ups.
Restate the problem: start with capital w, choose at most k projects, each project i requires capital[i] and gives profit[i]. You can only pick a project if current capital ≥ capital[i]. Goal: maximize final capital.
At any point, the best choice is the affordable project with the highest profit, because taking it increases capital and never reduces future options. This greedy choice is optimal due to the monotonic nature of capital.
Sort projects by required capital. Use a max-heap to store profits of all projects whose capital requirement ≤ current capital. For up to k iterations, add newly affordable projects to the heap, then if heap is non-empty, pop the max profit and add it to capital.
Time complexity: O(n log n) for sorting + O(n log n) for heap operations (each project added/removed once). Space: O(n). Handle edge cases: no affordable projects, k=0, or fewer than k projects available.
Trace a small example to verify correctness. Conclude that the algorithm returns the maximum possible capital after at most k projects.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.