I started with the leaderboard because it felt like the flashiest part and I figured I'd impress them.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then propose a high-level architecture that separates submission handling, code execution, and leaderboard updates. Dive into each component (test case storage, execution orchestration, message queue fault tolerance, scaling) with specific technologies and trade-offs, emphasizing reliability and low latency.
Pro tip: Emphasize idempotency and exactly-once processing in the execution pipeline to avoid duplicate submissions and leaderboard corruption, and discuss how you'd monitor and alert on queue lag and execution failures.
Ask about expected number of users, submissions per second, supported languages, and leaderboard update frequency. Define SLAs for execution latency and leaderboard consistency.
Sketch components: API gateway, submission service, message queue, execution workers, test case storage, results database, leaderboard service, and caching layer. Explain data flow from submission to result.
Propose storing test cases in object storage (e.g., S3) with metadata in a database, and orchestrating execution via a queue-based system where workers pull tasks, run code in sandboxed containers, and report results.
Design the queue for durability, replication, and exactly-once processing using acknowledgments, dead-letter queues, and idempotent consumers. Scale horizontally by adding workers and partitioning the queue.
Implement a real-time leaderboard using a distributed cache (e.g., Redis sorted sets) with periodic persistence to a database. Scale globally with regional deployments, CDN for static assets, and eventual consistency for leaderboard updates.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.