This is a meaty question for a screening round.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a high-level architecture that separates data ingestion, processing, and storage. Focus on the streaming anomaly detection approach, explaining algorithms and trade-offs, and finally discuss scalability and fault tolerance.
Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of defining what constitutes an 'anomaly' upfront, as it varies by domain and impacts algorithm choice. Also, discuss how you would handle false positives and concept drift, showing awareness of real-world challenges.
Ask questions to understand data volume, velocity, variety, latency requirements, and what defines an anomaly. Determine if the system needs real-time detection or can tolerate batch processing.
Outline components: data ingestion (e.g., Kafka, Pub/Sub), stream processing (e.g., Flink, Beam), anomaly detection logic, storage (e.g., Bigtable, BigQuery), and alerting. Discuss data flow and integration points.
Describe algorithms suitable for streaming data, such as statistical methods (z-score, moving average), machine learning models (autoencoders, isolation forests), or rule-based systems. Explain how to train and update models in real-time.
Explain how to scale horizontally using partitioned streams, distributed processing, and load balancing. Discuss handling failures with replication, checkpointing, and exactly-once semantics.
Mention metrics for success (precision, recall, latency), monitoring the system, and incorporating feedback to reduce false positives and adapt to changing patterns.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.