← Microsoft Interview Insights
I spent too long on the ingestion layer and ran out of steam by the time we got to querying.
Start by clarifying requirements (data volume, latency, durability, query patterns) and then propose a high-level architecture that separates ingestion, storage, and processing layers. Walk through each component, emphasizing trade-offs and how the design meets both real-time and batch needs.
Pro tip: Show awareness of cost and operational complexity by discussing how to tier storage and use managed services where appropriate, and mention backpressure and exactly-once semantics as key challenges.
Ask about data volume (events per second), latency requirements for real-time analytics, retention policies, and query patterns. This ensures the design is tailored to actual needs.
Propose a scalable ingestion pipeline using a distributed message queue (e.g., Kafka, Event Hubs) to handle millions of devices. Discuss protocols (MQTT, HTTP), device authentication, and data validation.
Choose storage solutions for different needs: a time-series database or data lake for raw data, and a columnar store for analytics. Discuss partitioning, replication, and tiered storage for cost efficiency.
Implement stream processing (e.g., Flink, Spark Streaming) for real-time analytics and batch processing (e.g., Spark, MapReduce) for offline aggregation. Highlight how to maintain consistency between the two paths.
Provide APIs for querying real-time and historical data. Discuss indexing, caching, and query optimization. Mention how to handle aggregations and joins across streams and batches.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.