Spent probably too long on the data model upfront and had to rush the concurrency stuff later, which is honestly where the interesting problems live.
Start by clarifying requirements and scope (e.g., single restaurant vs. multi-restaurant carts, real-time menu updates, promotions). Then design a scalable, eventually consistent architecture that separates cart service from menu and order services, using a data model that supports item customization and pricing. Walk through the end-to-end flow from cart creation to checkout, highlighting trade-offs and failure handling.
Pro tip: Emphasize idempotency and consistency: carts are mutable and user-facing, so use optimistic concurrency control and idempotent operations to handle duplicate requests and race conditions. Also, discuss how to handle menu changes (e.g., item unavailable) gracefully without breaking the cart.
Ask questions to define functional and non-functional requirements: single vs. multi-restaurant carts, guest vs. logged-in users, real-time menu updates, promotions, and scale (e.g., millions of users). Establish constraints like latency, consistency, and availability.
Sketch the main components: API Gateway, Cart Service, Menu Service, Pricing/Promotions Service, Order Service, and data stores (e.g., NoSQL for carts, cache for menus). Explain how they interact and the overall data flow.
Design the cart data model: cart ID, user ID, restaurant ID, items (with customizations, quantity, price), status, timestamps. Choose a storage solution (e.g., DynamoDB, Cassandra) that supports high write throughput and eventual consistency, and discuss caching strategies.
Walk through key operations: add/remove/update item, apply promo, checkout. Define RESTful or gRPC APIs, and describe how the Cart Service validates items against the Menu Service, calculates totals with the Pricing Service, and hands off to the Order Service.
Discuss trade-offs: consistency vs. availability, synchronous vs. asynchronous validation, and handling menu changes (e.g., item becomes unavailable). Cover scalability (sharding by user ID), idempotency, retries, and graceful degradation.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.