← Goldman Sachs Interview Insights
The global blocklist part was fine, basically a set lookup.
Start by clarifying the existing rules engine architecture and the function signature, then propose a rule-based design where each rule is a separate class implementing a common interface. For the MCC blocklist, implement two rules: one for global blocklist and one for per-user blocklist, and integrate them into the engine without changing the signature. Emphasize extensibility by showing how new rules can be added with minimal changes.
Pro tip: Discuss the trade-offs between checking global and per-user blocklists in terms of performance and data consistency, and suggest caching strategies for per-user blocklists to reduce latency. Also, mention the importance of logging and monitoring for fraud rules to detect false positives.
Ask about the existing engine's design, the function signature, and how rules are currently evaluated. Confirm whether the blocklists are static or dynamic, and the expected latency and throughput.
Propose a Rule interface with a method like `evaluate(transaction, userContext)` returning a boolean or decision. Each rule encapsulates its logic, promoting extensibility and separation of concerns.
Create two concrete rules: GlobalMCCBlocklistRule and UserMCCBlocklistRule. The global rule checks a static set, while the user rule checks a per-user set fetched from a data store.
Register the new rules with the engine's rule registry or pipeline, ensuring the function signature remains unchanged. The engine should evaluate all rules and reject if any rule triggers.
Discuss how to add future rules (e.g., velocity checks) by simply adding new Rule implementations. Mention caching per-user blocklists and using efficient data structures like sets for O(1) lookups.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.