Start by clarifying requirements (real-time collaboration, conflict resolution, scalability) and then propose a conflict-free replicated data type (CRDT) or operational transformation (OT) based architecture. Walk through the system components: clients, WebSocket servers, document state store, and persistence, explaining how they interact to ensure eventual consistency. Finally, discuss trade-offs between CRDT and OT, and how to handle offline editing and scaling.
Pro tip: Mention that CRDTs are often preferred for peer-to-peer and offline-first scenarios due to their simplicity in ensuring eventual consistency, but OT can be more efficient for centralized systems with frequent small edits. Show awareness of real-world implementations like Yjs or ShareDB.
Ask about expected number of concurrent users, document size, latency requirements, and whether offline editing is needed. This shapes the choice of conflict resolution algorithm and system architecture.
Decide between Operational Transformation (OT) and Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs). Explain the trade-offs: OT requires a central server for transformation, while CRDTs allow decentralized updates but may have higher metadata overhead.
Outline components: clients, WebSocket servers for real-time communication, a document state store (e.g., Redis or in-memory), and persistent storage (e.g., database). Describe how updates flow from clients to server and are broadcast to other clients.
Explain how the chosen algorithm guarantees convergence (e.g., CRDTs merge automatically, OT transforms operations). Discuss handling network partitions, offline edits, and server failures with replication and persistence.
Discuss scaling WebSocket servers horizontally, sharding documents, and optimizing state synchronization (e.g., using snapshots and delta updates). Mention monitoring and load balancing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.