← Databricks Interview Insights
The key insight I kept circling around was that you can't just track position, you have to track (position, current mode) as your state.
Model the problem as a shortest path search on an expanded state space where each state is (cell, mode). Use Dijkstra's algorithm to handle non-negative edge weights, including mode-switch costs. Discuss how movement constraints and mode-switch costs affect the graph and algorithm choice.
Pro tip: Clarify assumptions early: are mode-switch costs uniform? Can you switch modes only at certain cells? This shows you think about edge cases and practical constraints, which is crucial for real-world systems like Databricks.
Ask about grid size, number of modes, movement rules (e.g., 4-directional vs. 8-directional), mode-switch costs, and whether switching is allowed anywhere or only at specific cells.
Represent each state as (row, col, mode). This captures both position and current transportation mode, allowing correct cost accounting for moves and switches.
For each state, add edges for moving to adjacent cells using the same mode (cost = mode's step cost) and for switching modes at the same cell (cost = switch cost). Ensure blocked cells are excluded.
Use Dijkstra's algorithm since all edge weights are non-negative. Initialize distances to infinity, set start state distance to 0, and process nodes in order of increasing distance.
Time complexity is O((R*C*M) log(R*C*M)) for R rows, C columns, M modes. Discuss potential optimizations like bidirectional search or A* with a heuristic if applicable.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.