← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
Jul 2026

Summary

Google SWE interview with a grid-based constraint satisfaction problem. The problem looked like a straightforward placement puzzle but the house adjacency rule on top of the row/column uniqueness made it a real backtracking exercise. No outcome info shared.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given an N x N grid with houses ('H') and empty cells ('0'), place flowers ('F') such that each row and each column contains exactly one flower, and every house has exactly one flower among its 4-directional neighbors. Return a valid grid or indicate no solution exists.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The row/column uniqueness part felt like N-queens to me immediately, so I went straight to backtracking.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the problem as a constraint satisfaction problem where each row and column must have exactly one flower, and each house must have exactly one adjacent flower. Use backtracking with constraint propagation, placing flowers row by row while checking row, column, and house constraints, and prune early when constraints are violated.

Pro tip: Start by discussing the problem's complexity and potential NP-hardness, then propose a backtracking solution with pruning, and mention how you would optimize using bitmasks or DLX for large N.

1. Understand and Restate the Problem

Clarify the constraints: exactly one flower per row and column, and each house must have exactly one flower among its four orthogonal neighbors. Confirm that flowers can only be placed on empty cells ('0').

2. Identify Constraints and Model

Model as a constraint satisfaction problem: variables are rows (or columns) with domain of possible column positions for the flower. Constraints: all-different on columns, and for each house, exactly one adjacent flower.

3. Choose Algorithm and Data Structures

Use backtracking with pruning. Represent the grid and track used columns, and for each house, count adjacent flowers. Use bitmasks for rows/columns and precompute house adjacency to speed up checks.

4. Implement and Optimize

Implement recursive backtracking: for each row, try placing a flower in each unused column that doesn't violate house constraints. Prune if any house already has more than one adjacent flower or if a house cannot get a flower. Optimize with constraint propagation (e.g., forward checking).

5. Analyze Complexity and Trade-offs

Discuss time complexity (worst-case exponential) and space complexity. Mention trade-offs between backtracking and other methods like SAT solvers or integer programming, and when each might be preferable.

Key Points to Mention

  • Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) formulation with variables and constraints
  • Backtracking with pruning and forward checking
  • Bitmask representation for rows and columns to track used positions
  • Precomputation of house adjacency and incremental constraint checking
  • Complexity analysis: worst-case exponential, but pruning reduces practical runtime
  • Alternative approaches: SAT solvers, integer programming, or DLX for exact cover

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.