I went straight to engagement numbers and immediately felt the interviewer cooling off.
Start by clarifying what 'meaningful social interactions' means for Meta's products, then propose a hierarchy of metrics that capture depth, reciprocity, and user value. Focus on outcome-oriented metrics that correlate with long-term retention and well-being, not just engagement volume.
Pro tip: Acknowledge the tension between optimizing for time spent and meaningful interactions, and suggest guardrail metrics to ensure you're not incentivizing passive consumption or shallow engagement.
Clarify what constitutes a meaningful social interaction in the context of Meta's mission, considering factors like depth, reciprocity, and user perception.
List the types of interactions that could be meaningful (e.g., comments, shares, messages) and prioritize those that align with the definition.
Develop specific metrics for each interaction type, such as reply rate, conversation depth, or percentage of interactions that lead to further engagement.
Suggest using surveys or user interviews to validate that the proposed metrics correlate with users' perception of meaningfulness.
Define counter-metrics to monitor for unintended consequences, such as increased time spent but decreased well-being.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.