← Credit Genie Interview Insights
The existing endpoints were basically a blueprint so I leaned on those hard.
First, review the existing create and read endpoints to understand the project's conventions for routing, dependency injection, and response models. Then implement update and delete endpoints that mirror those patterns, using the shared Pydantic models and appropriate HTTP status codes. Finally, verify edge cases like missing resources and partial updates.
Pro tip: Mention that you'll use Pydantic's `exclude_unset` for PATCH-style updates to avoid overwriting fields with defaults, and return 204 No Content for successful deletes to match REST best practices.
Examine the create and read endpoints to identify patterns for path parameters, request bodies, response models, and error handling. Note the status codes used (e.g., 201 for create, 200 for read).
Decide between PUT (full replacement) and PATCH (partial update) based on the existing schemas. Use the shared Pydantic model for the request body and return the updated resource with a 200 status code.
Implement a DELETE endpoint that removes the resource by ID. Return 204 No Content on success, and 404 if the resource doesn't exist.
Add proper error handling for non-existent IDs (404), invalid input (422), and ensure database operations are atomic. Use FastAPI's HTTPException for consistent error responses.
Write or run tests to confirm the new endpoints work correctly, including success cases, not-found cases, and validation errors. Ensure they match the existing API contract.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
I patched the data layer and tested happy paths plus the 404 cases.
Start by clarifying the API contract and test environment, then outline a test plan that covers each CRUD operation with happy path, edge cases, and error scenarios. Emphasize isolation, repeatability, and the use of mocks or test doubles for external dependencies.
Pro tip: Use a test data builder or factory to create valid payloads and avoid hardcoding, making tests more maintainable and less brittle. Also, consider contract testing to ensure your tests align with the API specification.
Review the API documentation for the four CRUD endpoints, including request/response formats, status codes, and authentication. Clarify any ambiguities about expected behavior.
Configure a testing framework (e.g., JUnit, pytest, Jest) and ensure you can run tests in isolation. Use a test database or mock external services to avoid dependencies.
For each endpoint, write tests covering successful operations, invalid inputs, missing resources, and authorization failures. Use parameterized tests to cover multiple scenarios efficiently.
Use setup and teardown methods to create and destroy test data, ensuring tests don't interfere with each other. Consider using transactions or in-memory databases for speed.
Execute the test suite, check coverage, and refine tests to cover edge cases. Integrate with CI/CD to run tests automatically on code changes.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Emphasize a systematic learning approach: start by exploring the existing codebase and FastAPI documentation to understand patterns, then incrementally implement endpoints with testing. Highlight adaptability, resourcefulness, and leveraging team knowledge.
Pro tip: Show that you prioritize understanding the 'why' behind existing patterns before writing code, and that you're not afraid to ask targeted questions after doing your own research.
Review the current codebase to identify similar endpoints, project structure, and conventions. Skim FastAPI documentation for core concepts like routing, request handling, and dependency injection.
Create a simple endpoint (e.g., health check) to validate your understanding and environment. Use FastAPI's interactive docs (Swagger UI) to test it.
Build one endpoint at a time, following existing patterns and reusing utilities. Write tests alongside to ensure correctness and catch issues early.
Share your work with teammates for review, ask specific questions where stuck, and refine based on feedback. Document any new patterns you introduce.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.