← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Google SWE technical phone screen, one probability/DP problem the whole time. The interviewer pushed hard on the analytical approach and made it clear simulation wasn't going to cut it.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

You start at position 0 on an infinite 1D grid. Each turn you roll a fair K-sided die and move forward by the result. If you land inside the range [mn, mx] you win; if you go past mx you lose. What's the probability of winning, and can you derive it analytically rather than via simulation?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

My first instinct was Monte Carlo and I basically said so out loud, which was a mistake.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the process as a Markov chain or recurrence relation where the probability of winning from position i depends on the probabilities from positions i+1 through i+K. Derive a linear recurrence and solve it analytically, possibly using generating functions or matrix exponentiation, to get a closed-form expression for the probability starting at 0.

Pro tip: Emphasize that the recurrence can be solved efficiently with dynamic programming in O(mx) time, but the analytical solution reveals the structure and avoids simulation. Mention that for large mx, matrix exponentiation or generating functions give O(K^3 log mx) or closed forms.

1. Define the state and recurrence

Let P(i) be the probability of winning starting from position i. For i in [mn, mx], P(i)=1; for i > mx, P(i)=0. For i < mn, P(i) = (1/K) * sum_{d=1}^K P(i+d).

2. Identify boundary conditions and simplify

Note that for i >= mn, P(i)=1. Thus for i < mn, the sum includes terms where i+d >= mn, which contribute 1. This gives a recurrence with known constants.

3. Solve the recurrence analytically

The recurrence is linear with constant coefficients. Solve the characteristic equation: K*x^K = sum_{j=1}^K x^{K-j}? Actually, rearrange: P(i) - (1/K) sum_{d=1}^K P(i+d) = 0. Assume solution of form r^i, leading to characteristic equation: K = sum_{d=1}^K r^d? Wait, careful: P(i) = (1/K) sum P(i+d) => K P(i) - sum P(i+d)=0. Substitute P(i)=r^i: K r^i - sum_{d=1}^K r^{i+d} = 0 => K - sum_{d=1}^K r^d = 0. So characteristic equation: sum_{d=1}^K r^d = K. One root is r=1. Other roots can be found. General solution is linear combination of r^i for each root, with coefficients determined by boundary conditions.

4. Apply boundary conditions to find coefficients

Use the known values P(mn)=1, P(mn+1)=1, ..., P(mx)=1, and P(mx+1)=0, etc., to set up equations for the coefficients. Since the recurrence holds for i < mn, we need enough boundary values to determine the solution.

5. Compute P(0) and discuss complexity

Plug i=0 into the general solution to get the winning probability. Discuss that the analytical solution may involve solving a polynomial of degree K, which is not always closed-form for large K, but can be computed numerically or via matrix methods.

Key Points to Mention

  • Markov chain formulation and recurrence relation
  • Boundary conditions: absorbing states at win and loss
  • Characteristic equation and roots (including r=1)
  • Generating functions or matrix exponentiation for efficient computation
  • Time complexity: O(mx) DP vs O(K^3 log mx) matrix exponentiation
  • Edge cases: K=1, mn=0, mx large, etc.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.