This question sprawls in every direction and I underestimated how much they wanted on the monitoring side.
Structure your answer as a clear end-to-end ML lifecycle, emphasizing how each stage addresses fraud detection's unique challenges like severe class imbalance and concept drift. Balance technical depth with product impact, and highlight trade-offs between detection accuracy and user experience.
Pro tip: Frame the problem in terms of business metrics (e.g., fraud loss vs. false positive cost) and show how your technical choices directly optimize those metrics. Mention that at Netflix, even rare fraud can harm trust, so precision at high recall is critical.
Define fraud, success metrics (e.g., fraud caught, false positive rate), and data sources (transactions, user behavior, device info). Address data collection challenges like label delay and noise.
Handle missing values, create time-based features, and engineer behavioral aggregates. Use techniques like SMOTE, class weights, or anomaly detection for imbalance.
Choose models (e.g., gradient boosting, neural networks) and train with imbalance-aware loss functions. Evaluate using precision-recall AUC, F1, and cost-sensitive metrics.
Deploy as a real-time API with low latency, integrate with payment systems, and set up A/B testing or shadow mode to validate performance.
Monitor model performance, data drift, and concept drift. Implement automated retraining, online learning, or ensemble methods to adapt.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.