← ServiceNow Interview Insights
Part one wasn't bad, I got the greedy approach pretty quickly.
Use a two-pointer technique to compare characters from both ends, counting mismatches and deciding which character to replace to achieve the lexicographically smallest palindrome. For each mismatch, replace the larger character with the smaller one to minimize the string lexicographically, and handle the middle character if needed. The minimum number of replacements is the number of mismatched pairs.
Pro tip: Clarify that the goal is to minimize replacements first, then lexicographic order; this two-level optimization is key. Also, mention that if the string length is odd, the middle character can be changed to 'a' if it's not already, but only if it doesn't increase the replacement count.
Restate the problem: only replacements allowed, minimize replacements to make palindrome, then among those, return lexicographically smallest. Confirm that no insertions/deletions are allowed.
Use left and right pointers moving inward. For each pair, if characters differ, it's a mismatch; count it. These mismatches dictate the minimum replacements needed.
For each mismatched pair, replace the larger character with the smaller one to make them equal, ensuring the resulting string is lexicographically smallest. If characters are equal, consider if they can be reduced to 'a' without increasing replacements (only if both are not 'a' and it doesn't affect mismatch count).
If the string length is odd, the middle character can be changed to 'a' if it's not already, but only if it doesn't increase the total replacements (i.e., it's a free change).
Build the palindrome by applying the decided replacements, ensuring the minimum replacement count is maintained and the string is lexicographically smallest.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.