← Openai Interview Insights

Openai·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
May 2026Remote

Summary

OpenAI software engineer interview with a multi-part algorithmic problem built around grid-based infection spread. The question kept evolving with each follow-up and by part four I was pretty much improvising.

Questions Asked (4)

Q1

Given an m x n grid with empty cells, healthy people, and infected people, find the minimum number of minutes for all healthy people to become infected via 4-directional spread each minute. Return -1 if it's impossible.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Classic multi-source BFS, I knew it immediately.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the grid as a graph and use multi-source BFS starting from all initially infected cells simultaneously. Track the time each healthy cell gets infected, and after BFS, check if any healthy cell remains uninfected; if so, return -1, otherwise return the maximum infection time.

Pro tip: Clarify that the problem is equivalent to finding the shortest path from any infected cell to each healthy cell, and mention that BFS is optimal because each minute corresponds to one layer of expansion. Also, handle edge cases like no healthy people (return 0) and no infected people (return -1 if healthy exist).

1. Understand the problem and edge cases

Restate the problem: each minute, infected cells spread to adjacent healthy cells in 4 directions. Determine edge cases: no healthy cells (return 0), no infected cells but healthy exist (return -1), and grid boundaries.

2. Initialize BFS queue and counters

Scan the grid to enqueue all initially infected cells with time 0, and count the number of healthy cells. Use a queue for BFS and a variable to track the maximum time.

3. Perform multi-source BFS

While the queue is not empty, pop a cell and its time, explore its 4 neighbors. If a neighbor is healthy, infect it (mark as infected), decrement the healthy count, enqueue it with time+1, and update the maximum time.

4. Check for remaining healthy cells

After BFS, if the healthy count is greater than 0, return -1 (impossible to infect all). Otherwise, return the maximum time recorded.

5. Analyze complexity and discuss optimizations

State time complexity O(m*n) since each cell is processed once, and space complexity O(m*n) for the queue. Mention that in-place modification of the grid can save space if allowed.

Key Points to Mention

  • Multi-source BFS is the optimal approach because it simulates simultaneous spread from all infected cells.
  • Time complexity is O(m*n) as each cell is visited at most once.
  • Space complexity is O(m*n) for the queue in the worst case.
  • Edge cases: no healthy cells (return 0), no infected cells but healthy exist (return -1), and unreachable healthy cells (return -1).
  • Use a queue to process cells level by level, where each level represents one minute.
  • Mark cells as infected as soon as they are enqueued to avoid duplicate processing.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Follow-up: some cells are immune and cannot be infected. How does your solution change, and when should you return -1?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Mostly the same BFS, just treat immune cells like walls.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the original problem and the meaning of 'immune' cells. Then, adapt your algorithm to treat immune cells as blocked nodes, and determine the conditions under which the target becomes unreachable, returning -1.

Pro tip: Explicitly state that immune cells are like obstacles, and discuss how this affects the algorithm's complexity and edge cases, such as when the start or target is immune.

1. Clarify the problem

Restate the original problem and confirm what 'immune' means (e.g., cannot be infected, cannot be traversed). Ask if immune cells are given as input or must be inferred.

2. Model immune cells as obstacles

Treat immune cells as blocked nodes in the grid/graph. Update the algorithm to skip these cells during traversal or infection spread.

3. Adjust algorithm logic

Modify BFS/DFS or simulation to ignore immune cells. If using a queue, do not enqueue immune cells. If using dynamic programming, set their values to unreachable.

4. Determine -1 condition

Return -1 if the target cannot be reached due to immune cells blocking all paths, or if the start or target itself is immune (if that's disallowed).

5. Analyze complexity and edge cases

Discuss how immune cells affect time/space complexity (usually unchanged) and mention edge cases like no immune cells, all cells immune, or disconnected components.

Key Points to Mention

  • Immune cells act as obstacles; treat them as blocked nodes.
  • Check if start or target is immune; if so, return -1 immediately.
  • Use BFS/DFS with a visited set, skipping immune cells.
  • Return -1 when the target is unreachable after traversal.
  • Complexity remains O(N) for grid traversal, where N is number of cells.
  • Consider if immune cells can be infected indirectly or if they block spread.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Follow-up: multiple infection sources spread at different rates or with different infection probabilities. How would you model and solve this?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where I started sweating.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify the model by defining each source's infection rate and probability, then choose a mathematical representation such as a multi-type branching process or a system of differential equations. Discuss solution methods like numerical simulation or matrix exponentiation, and analyze the impact of different parameters on the overall spread.

Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of validating the model with edge cases (e.g., one source with zero rate) and discussing computational trade-offs between simulation and analytical solutions. Show awareness that in practice, parameters are often estimated from data, so sensitivity analysis is crucial.

1. Clarify the problem and assumptions

Ask clarifying questions to understand the number of sources, whether they interact, and what 'spread' means (e.g., number of infected individuals over time). State any simplifying assumptions.

2. Choose a mathematical model

Select a model that captures multiple sources with different rates/probabilities, such as a multi-type branching process, a compartmental model with multiple infectious classes, or a network diffusion model.

3. Formulate equations or simulation rules

Write down the governing equations (e.g., ODEs for expected values) or define the stochastic simulation steps. Include parameters for each source's rate and probability.

4. Select solution method and analyze

Decide between analytical (e.g., solving ODEs, matrix exponentiation) and numerical (e.g., Monte Carlo simulation) approaches based on scale and required precision. Analyze how different parameters affect the outcome.

5. Discuss trade-offs and extensions

Compare computational complexity, accuracy, and scalability of chosen methods. Mention potential extensions like time-varying rates or source interactions.

Key Points to Mention

  • Multi-type branching processes or compartmental models with multiple infectious classes
  • System of differential equations for expected number of infections
  • Stochastic simulation (e.g., Gillespie algorithm) for exact dynamics
  • Matrix exponentiation for linear systems
  • Sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation from data
  • Computational trade-offs: analytical vs. numerical, scalability

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q4

Follow-up: the grid receives streaming updates where new infected cells appear over time. How do you maintain the answer incrementally without recomputing from scratch?

System DesignAlgorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Honestly the hardest part.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by restating the problem and clarifying the update model: are new infected cells added one at a time or in batches, and what queries need to be answered incrementally? Then propose a data structure that maintains the current answer (e.g., count of connected components or affected regions) and updates it in O(1) or O(log n) per new infection by only examining the new cell's neighbors and merging components as needed.

Pro tip: Mention that you would handle deletions or re-infections by using a union-find with rollback or a dynamic connectivity structure, but only if the interviewer asks—showing you know the limits of your approach without overcomplicating the initial solution.

1. Clarify the update and query model

Ask whether updates are single-cell insertions or batches, whether cells can be cured (deletions), and what exactly needs to be maintained (e.g., number of infected clusters, total infected area, or shortest path to a target).

2. Choose an incremental data structure

Select a structure like union-find (disjoint set) for connectivity, or a grid with per-cell state and neighbor checks. Explain how it supports efficient updates and queries.

3. Define the update algorithm

For each new infected cell, check its four neighbors. If a neighbor is infected, union their components. Update any global counters (e.g., number of components) based on the merges.

4. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

State the time per update (near O(1) amortized with union-find) and space (O(n) for the grid and parent array). Discuss trade-offs versus recomputing from scratch (O(n) per update).

5. Address edge cases and extensions

Mention handling of deletions (e.g., using dynamic connectivity or rebuilding periodically), concurrency if updates are parallel, and how to answer queries like 'is cell A connected to B?' efficiently.

Key Points to Mention

  • Union-Find (Disjoint Set Union) with path compression and union by rank for near-constant time updates.
  • Only need to check the four neighbors of the newly infected cell to update connectivity.
  • Maintain a global counter for the number of infected components or total infected area, updating it on merges.
  • Time complexity: O(α(n)) per update, where α is the inverse Ackermann function, versus O(n) for recomputation.
  • Space complexity: O(n) for the grid and union-find parent array.
  • For deletions, consider dynamic connectivity structures or periodic rebuilding, and discuss the trade-offs.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.