The problem statement itself took me a minute to parse.
First, clarify the problem: a subsequence is any sequence obtained by deleting characters without reordering, so we need to check all subsequences of length ≥3. Then, design a recursive backtracking solution that generates each subsequence and checks it against the dictionary, pruning early if an invalid word is found. Finally, analyze the time complexity as O(2^n * L) where L is the average word length, and space complexity as O(n) for recursion depth, noting that this is exponential and likely impractical for large n.
Pro tip: Mention that this problem is likely a trick or stress-test question: in practice, you'd never check all subsequences due to exponential blowup, and you should discuss optimizations like memoization or early termination, or question the problem's feasibility.
Confirm that 'subsequence' means any sequence obtained by deleting characters without reordering, and that we need to check all subsequences of length 3 or more. Ask about constraints on string length and dictionary size.
Use a recursive function that builds subsequences by including or excluding each character. When the current subsequence length reaches 3, check if it's in the dictionary; if not, return false. Continue until all subsequences are checked.
Implement the recursion with early termination: as soon as an invalid subsequence is found, return false. Optionally, use memoization to avoid rechecking the same subsequence, though the number of subsequences is exponential.
Time complexity is O(2^n * L) where n is string length and L is average word length for dictionary lookup. Space complexity is O(n) for recursion stack, plus O(2^n) if storing all subsequences, but we can avoid that.
Note that the brute-force approach is exponential and impractical for large n. Discuss possible optimizations like using a trie for the dictionary, or recognizing that the problem is likely NP-hard and may not have a polynomial solution.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.