← OpenAI Interview Insights

OpenAI·Data Scientist·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

Senior
Apr 2026

Summary

Brutal technical screen for a DS role at OpenAI. One question, but it was basically a full experiment design thesis spanning seven sub-parts. I've done A/B testing questions before but nothing close to this level of detail.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design a complete end-to-end A/B test to evaluate whether a 1-month free trial increases paid subscription conversions. Cover eligibility and randomization, the primary metric and observation window, intent-to-treat vs triggered analysis, sample size calculation, bias controls, fraud/interference handling, and your launch decision framework.

A/B Testing & ExperimentationPricing & MonetizationProduct Analytics & Metrics
Author's notes

This was a lot.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Structure your answer around the experiment lifecycle: define the population and randomization, specify metrics and analysis approach, calculate sample size, address biases and fraud, and conclude with a decision framework. Emphasize trade-offs and practical considerations, showing you can balance statistical rigor with business constraints.

Pro tip: Highlight the importance of pre-registering the analysis plan and guardrail metrics to prevent p-hacking and ensure trustworthy results. Also, discuss how to handle network effects or interference in a subscription-based product, as this is often overlooked.

1. Define eligibility and randomization

Specify who is eligible (e.g., new users, non-subscribers) and how to randomize them (e.g., user-level randomization with stratification). Ensure randomization is consistent and documented.

2. Choose primary metric and observation window

Select the primary metric (e.g., paid conversion rate within X days) and define the observation window that captures the trial period plus a buffer. Also, list secondary and guardrail metrics.

3. Decide analysis approach and sample size

Choose between intent-to-treat (ITT) and triggered analysis, justifying your choice. Calculate sample size based on baseline conversion, minimum detectable effect, power, and significance level, accounting for the observation window.

4. Address bias, fraud, and interference

Identify potential biases (e.g., selection bias, novelty effect) and mitigation strategies. Discuss fraud detection (e.g., multiple accounts) and interference (e.g., network effects) and how to handle them.

5. Establish launch decision framework

Define criteria for launch: statistical significance, practical significance, guardrail metrics not degraded, and qualitative insights. Include a plan for segment analysis and follow-up experiments.

Key Points to Mention

  • Eligibility criteria: new users, non-subscribers, exclude existing trial users; randomization at user level with stratification by key covariates.
  • Primary metric: conversion to paid subscription within a defined window (e.g., 60 days); secondary metrics: trial start rate, engagement, churn; guardrails: revenue, support tickets.
  • Intent-to-treat vs triggered analysis: ITT for overall effect, triggered for effect on those who start trial; discuss trade-offs and choose based on business question.
  • Sample size calculation: use baseline conversion rate, MDE, alpha=0.05, power=0.8; account for dilution if using triggered analysis; consider multiple testing correction.
  • Bias controls: pre-registration, randomization checks, novelty effect mitigation (run longer), segment analysis; fraud: detect multiple accounts via device/IP, exclude suspicious activity; interference: consider cluster randomization if network effects exist.
  • Launch decision: require statistically significant lift in primary metric, no degradation in guardrails, and practical significance; consider segment-level results and qualitative feedback.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.