This one took me a minute to even process.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints (e.g., data size, read/write ratio, consistency needs), then design a disk-optimized data layout with append-only logs and LSM-tree indexing to minimize random I/O. Walk through the read and write paths, emphasizing caching strategies and latency trade-offs, and explain how conditional reservations are handled atomically using write-ahead logging and in-memory indexes.
Pro tip: Explicitly discuss how you would handle the 'reserve if available' condition atomically without relying on fast storage—e.g., using a write-ahead log and a single-writer model to serialize updates, and leveraging Bloom filters to avoid unnecessary disk reads.
Ask about data volume, read/write ratio, latency targets, and consistency requirements to tailor the design. Confirm that spinning disk means high random I/O cost and limited RAM means small cache.
Propose an append-only log for durability and an LSM-tree or B-tree variant optimized for disk. Use sparse indexes and Bloom filters to reduce disk seeks.
Describe how reads traverse cache, index, and disk, and how writes are batched and appended. Explain how conditional reservations are implemented with atomic operations and logging.
Outline a caching strategy (e.g., LRU for hot items) and how to manage limited RAM, possibly using memory-mapped files or direct I/O with careful buffer management.
Discuss expected latencies for reads and writes, and trade-offs between consistency, durability, and performance. Mention techniques like group commit and read-ahead to mitigate disk latency.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.