I've done grade-school addition in code before so the core loop wasn't the problem.
Clarify the function signature and constraints, then simulate grade-school addition by iterating from the least significant digit with a carry. Handle edge cases like empty strings, leading zeros, and unequal lengths, and analyze time/space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that you can optimize space by reusing the longer string or using a StringBuilder, and discuss trade-offs between iterative and recursive approaches. Also, proactively ask about input validation and whether the output should preserve leading zeros.
Confirm input types (non-negative decimal strings), output type (string), and constraints (no built-in big integer libraries). Define the function signature, e.g., string addStrings(string num1, string num2).
Explain the two-pointer approach from the end of both strings, computing sum digit by digit with a carry. Build the result in reverse and then reverse it, or prepend to a StringBuilder.
List edge cases: empty strings, strings with leading zeros, one string longer than the other, carry at the end (e.g., '99' + '1' = '100'), and very long strings (performance).
Provide concrete examples like '123' + '456' = '579', '99' + '1' = '100', and '0' + '0' = '0'. Trace the algorithm step by step to demonstrate correctness.
State time complexity O(max(n, m)) where n and m are lengths of the input strings, and space complexity O(max(n, m)) for the output string. Mention that space can be O(1) extra if modifying input is allowed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Prefix sums plus binary search got me through the core of it pretty fast.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a prefix-sum array with binary search for O(n) init and O(log n) pick. For dynamic updates, discuss a Fenwick tree (BIT) with O(log n) updates and picks, and address precision and validation with concrete techniques.
Pro tip: Mention using 64-bit integers for prefix sums to avoid floating-point precision issues, and propose a chi-squared test to validate randomness—this shows depth beyond the basic algorithm.
Ask about input size, update frequency, precision requirements, and whether the city list is static or dynamic. This determines the choice of data structure.
Describe building a prefix-sum array of populations in O(n) time, then for each pick, generate a random number in [0, total) and binary search for the city. This gives O(log n) per pick.
For insertions, deletions, and population changes, suggest a Fenwick tree (BIT) to maintain prefix sums, enabling O(log n) updates and O(log n) picks. Mention that a balanced BST with subtree sums is an alternative.
Use 64-bit integers for sums to avoid overflow and floating-point errors. Validate randomness via chi-squared test or by comparing empirical frequencies to expected probabilities over many trials.
Compare prefix-sum + binary search vs. Fenwick tree in terms of update frequency, memory, and implementation complexity. Handle edge cases like zero populations, empty list, and total population overflow.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.