The part that tripped me up first was the identifier columns.
Start by profiling the data to identify quality issues and feature types, then systematically clean and preprocess using a pipeline that handles mixed types. Split the data before any preprocessing to avoid leakage, train a simple baseline model, and evaluate using appropriate metrics while explaining each choice in the context of the business problem.
Pro tip: Always set up a reproducible pipeline with fixed random seeds and document every decision—this demonstrates production readiness and makes your baseline easily iterable. Also, consider the cost of false positives vs. false negatives early to guide metric selection.
Inspect the dataset for missing values, outliers, duplicates, and inconsistencies. Decide on imputation or removal strategies and document your reasoning.
Split the data into train/validation/test sets before any preprocessing. Use stratified splitting if classes are imbalanced to maintain distribution.
Build a pipeline that applies appropriate transformations to numerical (e.g., scaling) and categorical (e.g., one-hot encoding) features. Fit the pipeline only on training data.
Train a simple baseline model (e.g., logistic regression or random forest) that handles mixed types. Evaluate using metrics like AUC-ROC, precision-recall, or F1, depending on class balance and business costs.
Clearly articulate why you chose each step, from cleaning to metric. Suggest next steps for improvement, such as feature engineering or hyperparameter tuning.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.