The core implementation wasn't the hard part, just a dict lookup and a comparison.
Start by clarifying the requirements and constraints, such as the expected operations, data volume, and concurrency needs. Then design a class that uses a hash map to store account lock expiry timestamps, and for each query, check if the account exists and if the current timestamp is before the expiry. Discuss trade-offs between different data structures and consider edge cases like expired locks and unknown accounts.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a concurrent data structure or synchronization to handle concurrent access, as Stripe's systems are highly concurrent. Also, discuss how you might extend the design to support distributed locking if the scheduler needs to scale across multiple instances.
Ask questions to understand the expected operations (e.g., lock, unlock, isLocked), input formats, and performance requirements. Confirm whether the scheduler needs to be thread-safe and if it should handle distributed scenarios.
Choose a data structure to store account lock information. A hash map mapping account IDs to expiry timestamps is efficient for O(1) lookups. Consider whether to store all known accounts or only locked ones.
Implement the isLocked method: check if the account exists in the map and if the current timestamp is before the expiry. Handle edge cases like expired locks (which should be considered unlocked) and unknown accounts.
Discuss how to make the class thread-safe (e.g., using ConcurrentHashMap or synchronized methods) and how the design could be extended for distributed systems (e.g., using Redis with TTL).
Outline test cases: locked account before expiry, after expiry, unknown account, and concurrent access. Mention the importance of unit tests and possibly property-based testing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.