← Bloomberg Interview Insights
I recognized the Candy Crush problem immediately and that was almost my downfall.
Use a stack of (value, count) pairs to process the array in a single pass. For each element, if it matches the top of the stack, increment the count; otherwise push a new pair. If the count reaches 3, pop the pair, which naturally handles cascading removals. Finally, reconstruct the array from the stack.
Pro tip: Emphasize that this stack-based solution is O(n) time and O(n) space, which is optimal. Mention that a naive approach with repeated scans would be O(n^2) and inefficient for large inputs, showing you consider scalability.
Clarify that removals cascade and that the array can be empty. Consider edge cases like all elements identical, no runs of three, or multiple cascading removals.
Use a stack where each element is a pair (value, count). This efficiently tracks consecutive runs and allows O(1) updates and removals.
Iterate through the input. If the current element matches the top value, increment its count; otherwise push (value, 1). If count reaches 3, pop the pair.
After processing, pop all pairs and expand them back into an array (or string) in the correct order. Return the result.
State that time and space are O(n). Walk through a small example to verify correctness, including a case with cascading removals.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.