The core structure is a hash map keyed by account name.
Start by clarifying requirements and edge cases, then propose a solution using a hash map to track balances and a list for rejected transactions. Walk through the algorithm step-by-step, emphasizing time/space complexity and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Discuss how you would handle concurrency and idempotency, as these are critical in financial systems like Stripe's. Also, mention the importance of maintaining the original order of rejected transactions and considering currency handling.
Ask questions to confirm assumptions: Are timestamps unique? Can multiple currencies exist per account? Should we consider currency conversion? What about initial balances? How to handle duplicate transactions?
Choose a hash map to store account balances (keyed by account name) for O(1) lookups. Use a list to collect rejected transactions in order. Consider if additional metadata (e.g., currency) needs tracking.
Iterate through transactions sequentially. For each, compute new balance. If new balance < 0, add to rejected list; else update balance. After processing, filter accounts with non-zero balances.
State time complexity O(n) and space O(m + r) where m is number of accounts and r is number of rejected transactions. Discuss trade-offs: e.g., using a database for persistence vs in-memory, handling large streams.
Mention how to handle concurrency (e.g., locking), idempotency (deduplication), currency conversion, and audit logging. Highlight potential optimizations like batch processing.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.