I went straight to the obvious stuff, reminders, social proof, gamification badges, and could tell midway through that I was just listing features without a real user problem anchoring it.
Start by clarifying the goal: increase voter turnout among LinkedIn's user base. Then, design a product that leverages LinkedIn's unique strengths—professional network, trusted connections, and data—to encourage civic participation without being partisan. Structure your answer by defining the problem, proposing a solution, and outlining a go-to-market strategy.
Pro tip: Emphasize non-partisanship and trust: LinkedIn's brand is professional and neutral, so the product must avoid political bias. Also, consider how to measure success beyond just votes—such as increased civic engagement or platform engagement.
Ask clarifying questions to understand the scope: Is this for a specific election or ongoing? What are the success metrics? Define the target audience (e.g., LinkedIn users in the US) and the primary goal (e.g., increase voter registration and turnout).
Understand why people don't vote: lack of information, apathy, logistical barriers. Consider how LinkedIn's professional context can address these—e.g., trusted information from connections, reminders, and social proof.
Generate ideas that leverage LinkedIn's features: a voter registration tool integrated into profiles, a 'I Voted' badge, reminders from connections, or a non-partisan information hub. Prioritize based on impact, feasibility, and alignment with LinkedIn's brand.
Describe the chosen product in detail: core functionality, user flow, and how it encourages voting. For example, a 'Voter Hub' that shows personalized ballot information, allows users to pledge to vote, and share with their network.
Explain how to launch and promote the product: partnerships with election authorities, in-app notifications, and leveraging influencers. Define success metrics: number of registrations, pledges, and actual votes (if measurable), as well as engagement metrics.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.