My first instinct was to write a separate helper that recomputes the subtree sum and count from scratch for each node, which works but is O(n^2) and they pushed back on it pretty fast.
Use a post-order traversal to compute each subtree's sum and node count, then verify that the node's value equals the integer average (sum divided by count). Return both the sum and count (or a boolean flag) from each recursive call to avoid redundant traversals.
Pro tip: Clarify the definition of 'integer average' upfront—whether it's floor, round, or exact division—and handle edge cases like empty trees or single nodes. Also, mention that you can short-circuit and return early if any subtree fails the condition.
Ask the interviewer to confirm the definition of 'integer average' (e.g., floor, round, or exact) and discuss edge cases such as an empty tree, a single node, or negative values.
Decide on a post-order traversal (left, right, root) because you need subtree information before checking the current node. Plan to return both the sum of values and the number of nodes in the subtree.
Write a helper function that returns a pair (sum, count) and a boolean indicating whether the subtree satisfies the condition. At each node, combine left and right results, compute the average, and compare with the node's value.
Code the solution iteratively or recursively, ensuring integer division is handled correctly. Test with simple cases (single node, perfect tree) and edge cases (unbalanced tree, negative values).
State that the time complexity is O(n) since each node is visited once, and space complexity is O(h) for recursion stack. Mention that early termination can improve average-case performance.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.