← SIG (Susquehanna) Interview Insights
Systematically test each of the four role assignments by checking whether B's statement about A's truthfulness aligns with the truth-telling or lying behavior dictated by their roles. Eliminate assignments that lead to contradictions, and clearly state which assignments remain logically consistent.
Pro tip: In logic puzzles, it's often efficient to assume a role for one person and see if the other's statement forces a contradiction; also, remember that 'always lies' means every statement they make is false, so if A is a Knave, B's statement 'You always lie' is true, which would require B to be a Knight.
Knights always tell the truth; Knaves always lie. B's statement is 'You always lie,' which is a truth claim about A's truthfulness.
For each of the four role pairs (A, B), determine whether B's statement is true or false based on A's role, then check if that truth value matches B's role (Knight must tell truth, Knave must lie).
If B's statement truth value does not match B's role, the assignment is inconsistent. Eliminate those assignments.
List the assignments that survive the consistency check. In this case, only (Knave, Knight) and (Knave, Knave) are consistent.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.