← Nextdoor Interview Insights

Nextdoor·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

Senior
Jul 2026

Summary

Nextdoor ML Engineer interview with a topological sort problem that had a tricky lexicographic twist and a follow-up about grouping constraints. The core algorithm wasn't the hard part, the extensions were.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Given n items and a list of ordering constraints, return a valid ordering that satisfies all constraints. If multiple valid orderings exist, return the lexicographically smallest one by item ID. If no valid ordering exists due to a cycle, return 'IMPOSSIBLE'. Also analyze time and space complexity.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The base topological sort was fine, but the lexicographic requirement tripped me up for a bit.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the constraints as a directed graph and use Kahn's algorithm for topological sorting, replacing the standard queue with a min-heap to ensure the lexicographically smallest ordering. If the heap empties before all items are processed, a cycle exists, so return 'IMPOSSIBLE'. Analyze complexity as O(V + E log V) time and O(V + E) space.

Pro tip: Explicitly state that you're using a min-heap instead of a queue to guarantee lexicographic order, and mention that this is a common interview twist that tests understanding of both topological sort and priority queues.

1. Clarify the problem and edge cases

Confirm that items are identified by comparable IDs (e.g., integers or strings) and that constraints are directed edges. Ask about input size, whether duplicate edges are possible, and if the graph is guaranteed to be a DAG.

2. Build the graph and compute in-degrees

Create an adjacency list for the directed graph and an array to track in-degrees of each node. Iterate through all constraints to populate both structures.

3. Initialize a min-heap with zero in-degree nodes

Push all nodes with in-degree 0 into a min-heap (priority queue) to always extract the smallest available item, ensuring lexicographic order.

4. Process nodes and update in-degrees

While the heap is not empty, pop the smallest node, append it to the result, and for each neighbor, decrement its in-degree; if it becomes 0, push it into the heap.

5. Check for cycles and analyze complexity

If the result length is less than n, a cycle exists, so return 'IMPOSSIBLE'. Otherwise, return the result. State time complexity O(V + E log V) and space complexity O(V + E).

Key Points to Mention

  • Topological sorting with Kahn's algorithm (BFS-based) is ideal for detecting cycles and producing an ordering.
  • Using a min-heap (priority queue) instead of a simple queue ensures the lexicographically smallest ordering.
  • Cycle detection: if the number of processed nodes is less than n, a cycle exists, so return 'IMPOSSIBLE'.
  • Time complexity: O(V + E log V) due to heap operations; space complexity: O(V + E) for graph and in-degree storage.
  • Edge cases: empty input, single node, duplicate edges, and disconnected components.
  • Alternative approach: DFS-based topological sort with cycle detection, but it requires additional steps to ensure lexicographic order.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Extend the previous solution to support groups where certain items must appear as contiguous blocks. Both within-group and between-group ordering constraints must be respected. Return any valid sequence or 'IMPOSSIBLE'.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem Design
Author's notes

This one got me.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Model the problem as a graph where each item and each group is a node, with directed edges for ordering constraints. Contract each group into a single node to enforce contiguity, then perform a topological sort on the condensed graph. If a cycle exists, return 'IMPOSSIBLE'; otherwise, expand the groups back into their items to produce a valid sequence.

Pro tip: Explicitly handle edge cases like empty groups, groups with a single item, and constraints that conflict with group contiguity (e.g., an item outside a group must come between two items of the same group). Discussing these shows thoroughness and can preempt interviewer concerns.

1. Clarify constraints and assumptions

Confirm that groups must appear as contiguous blocks, and that both within-group and between-group ordering constraints must be respected. Ask about edge cases like empty groups or conflicting constraints.

2. Build the graph with group contraction

Create nodes for each item and each group. Add directed edges for all ordering constraints. Then contract each group into a single node, merging all internal edges and redirecting external edges to the group node.

3. Detect cycles and perform topological sort

Run a cycle detection algorithm (e.g., DFS or Kahn's algorithm) on the condensed graph. If a cycle is found, return 'IMPOSSIBLE'. Otherwise, obtain a topological ordering of the condensed nodes.

4. Expand groups and validate contiguity

Replace each group node in the topological order with its internal topological order of items. Verify that the final sequence respects all original constraints and that groups remain contiguous.

5. Analyze complexity and discuss optimizations

State the time and space complexity (O(V+E) for graph construction and topological sort). Mention potential optimizations like incremental cycle detection or handling dynamic constraints.

Key Points to Mention

  • Graph representation with nodes for items and groups, and directed edges for ordering constraints.
  • Group contraction to enforce contiguity, ensuring internal group order is preserved.
  • Cycle detection using DFS or Kahn's algorithm to determine feasibility.
  • Topological sorting of the condensed graph to produce a valid sequence.
  • Expansion of group nodes back into items while maintaining internal order.
  • Handling edge cases: empty groups, single-item groups, conflicting constraints, and disconnected components.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.