I went with the standard hashmap plus doubly linked list combo, which they seemed fine with.
Start by clarifying requirements (capacity, eviction policy, thread-safety) and then propose a hash map combined with a doubly linked list to achieve O(1) operations. Explain how the hash map stores key-to-node references and the linked list maintains access order, with the most recently used at the head. Walk through get and put operations, covering edge cases like updating existing keys and evicting the least recently used when at capacity.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use a doubly linked list with sentinel head and tail nodes to simplify edge cases and avoid null checks, and discuss how you would make it thread-safe if needed (e.g., using a mutex or concurrent data structures).
Ask about cache capacity, expected operations, thread-safety needs, and whether keys/values are generic. Confirm that O(1) time complexity is required for both get and put.
Propose a hash map (dictionary) for O(1) key lookup and a doubly linked list to maintain access order. Explain that the hash map maps keys to nodes in the linked list.
Describe the node structure (key, value, prev, next) and the cache structure (hash map, head and tail pointers, capacity, current size). Mention using sentinel nodes to simplify operations.
For get: if key exists, move node to head and return value; else return -1. For put: if key exists, update value and move to head; else create new node, add to head, and if capacity exceeded, remove tail node and delete from hash map.
Confirm O(1) time for both operations due to hash map and linked list. Discuss edge cases: updating existing key, evicting when full, capacity 0 or 1, and thread-safety if required.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.