This was basically five questions crammed into one.
Structure your answer around the ML lifecycle: start with proxy label design and leakage-safe feature engineering, then compare two model families with calibration and cold-start strategies, and finish with offline evaluation, shadow testing, and a deployment policy that includes fairness, spillover mitigation, and drift monitoring. Emphasize how you would validate proxies and iterate using launch logging.
Pro tip: Propose a 'proxy validation' step: before modeling, correlate your proxy labels with a small human-labeled set or a holdout experiment to ensure they are predictive of true engagement. This shows rigor and prevents building on a flawed target.
Use pre-launch interaction data (e.g., co-clicks, co-views, co-purchases) to create proxy labels for 'benefit'. At launch, log true labels (e.g., clicks on 'More like this' recommendations) and ensure no leakage by using only pre-launch features for training.
Create user, product, and interaction features; include cross-features (e.g., user-category affinity). For cold-start, use content-based features, metadata, and global popularity; consider a separate model or fallback for new entities.
Choose e.g., matrix factorization (collaborative filtering) and gradient boosted trees (with cross-features). Calibrate outputs (e.g., Platt scaling) to ensure predicted probabilities align with true engagement rates, especially for ranking.
Use time-based splits and evaluate with ranking metrics (NDCG, MAP) and calibration plots. Run shadow testing (log model predictions without affecting users) to compare against production and detect issues before full launch.
Define a policy that ensures fair exposure across user segments, mitigates negative spillovers (e.g., cannibalization), and includes ongoing drift monitoring (e.g., PSI, retraining triggers). Use A/B testing to measure true impact.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.