← Atlassian Interview Insights
I jumped straight to hashmaps which was fine, but I fumbled the duplicate vote handling for longer than I should have.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a data structure that maps item IDs to their ratings and supports efficient updates and sorting. Discuss how to handle duplicate votes (e.g., overwrite or reject) and items with no votes (e.g., exclude or assign default). Finally, outline the algorithm for computing averages and sorting with tie-breaking.
Pro tip: Mention that you would confirm the expected behavior for duplicate votes and no-vote items with the interviewer, as these are ambiguous and could impact the design. This shows attention to detail and collaborative problem-solving.
Ask about expected scale, whether votes can be updated, and how to handle edge cases like duplicate votes and no-vote items. Confirm the output format for sorted items.
Propose a map from item ID to a list or map of agent ratings, or a map to aggregate data (sum, count) for efficiency. Consider memory vs. speed trade-offs.
Decide on duplicate vote behavior: either overwrite the previous rating or reject the new one. For items with no votes, either exclude them from the sorted list or include with a default average (e.g., 0).
Calculate average per item by summing ratings and dividing by count. Sort items by average descending, then by item ID ascending for ties. Use a comparator or sort with a custom key.
Discuss time and space complexity. For frequent queries, consider maintaining a sorted structure or caching results. Mention potential concurrency issues if applicable.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.