← Ziprecruiter Interview Insights
The prompt was way longer than the actual difficulty warranted, which threw me off a bit at first.
Clarify the requirements first: whether the list is static or dynamic, and if the IDs are ordered. Then propose an efficient solution using a hash map to store ID-to-index mappings, enabling O(1) next/previous lookups, and discuss trade-offs for dynamic updates.
Pro tip: Mention that if the list is static, you can precompute a mapping from each ID to its next and previous IDs, making lookups O(1) with O(n) space. Also, consider edge cases like first/last elements and non-existent IDs.
Ask about the list's mutability, ID uniqueness, ordering, and expected operations. Confirm whether next/previous should wrap around or return null at boundaries.
For static lists, use a hash map from ID to index or precomputed next/prev pointers. For dynamic lists, consider a doubly linked list combined with a hash map for O(1) updates.
Write functions getNextID(id) and getPrevID(id) that look up the ID in the map and return the adjacent ID, handling edge cases.
State time and space complexity: O(1) lookup time with O(n) space for the map. Discuss trade-offs if using a linked list for dynamic updates.
Walk through examples including first, last, middle, and non-existent IDs to demonstrate correctness and edge-case handling.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.