← Dropbox Interview Insights

Dropbox·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
May 2026

Summary

Dropbox coding round, extending a bank system with a ranking function. Pretty focused problem, felt like a Level 2 follow-up where they want to see if you can handle aggregation logic without getting sloppy about what counts as outgoing.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given an existing bank system, add a topNOutgoing(n) method that returns the top N account IDs ranked by total outgoing spend. Only transfers and payments sent out should count, not incoming deposits or transfers. Break ties by account ID.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignData Modeling
Author's notes

The tricky part is being precise about what counts as outgoing.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify the data model and constraints first, then propose an efficient solution that precomputes outgoing totals per account and maintains a sorted structure for top-N queries. Discuss trade-offs between batch processing and real-time updates, and handle ties by account ID.

Pro tip: Mention that you would maintain a min-heap of size N for top-N queries to achieve O(M log N) time, but also consider that if N is small and queries are frequent, a sorted list with binary search might be simpler and faster in practice.

1. Clarify requirements and data model

Ask about the scale of data, frequency of queries, and whether the method should be real-time or can be batch. Confirm that only outgoing transfers and payments count, and ties are broken by account ID ascending.

2. Design data structures

Propose maintaining a map from account ID to total outgoing amount, updated on each transaction. For top-N queries, consider a min-heap of size N or a sorted list, depending on query frequency and N size.

3. Outline algorithm for topNOutgoing

If using a heap: iterate through all accounts, push onto a min-heap of size N, and pop when size exceeds N. Then extract and sort the heap to return results in descending order of total, with ties broken by account ID.

4. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

Discuss time and space complexity: O(M log N) per query with M accounts, or O(1) query if pre-sorted. Compare with alternative approaches like sorting all accounts O(M log M) or using a balanced BST for dynamic updates.

5. Address edge cases and optimizations

Handle accounts with zero outgoing, N larger than number of accounts, and concurrent updates. Suggest caching or incremental updates if queries are frequent.

Key Points to Mention

  • Only outgoing transfers and payments count; incoming deposits and transfers are excluded.
  • Tie-breaking by account ID ascending when totals are equal.
  • Use of a min-heap of size N for efficient top-N selection.
  • Time complexity: O(M log N) per query, where M is number of accounts.
  • Space complexity: O(M) for storing totals, O(N) for heap.
  • Trade-offs between precomputation and on-demand computation based on query frequency.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.