I jumped straight to a map of table names to lists of row maps, which was the right call, but I fumbled explaining the schema part.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a design using a hash map for tables, each storing rows as dictionaries and a set of column names. Explain how INSERT updates the schema and how SELECT handles missing columns as NULL, and discuss trade-offs and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of schema evolution and query performance by discussing indexing strategies and the cost of schema updates, showing you think beyond basic functionality.
Ask about expected operations, concurrency, performance needs, and whether schema changes affect existing rows.
Propose using a hash map for tables, each table storing rows as dictionaries and a set of column names for the schema.
On insert, update the table's schema with any new columns and store the row, filling missing columns with NULL.
For select, iterate over rows, and for each requested column, return the value or NULL if absent.
Talk about time/space complexity, indexing for faster queries, and handling concurrent access.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.