The naive sort-the-whole-array approach gets you the right answer but misses the point entirely.
Use a min-heap of size k to efficiently track the k largest elements in O(n log k) time. Iterate through the array, maintaining the heap so that it always contains the k largest elements seen so far. Finally, extract the elements from the heap and sort them in descending order.
Pro tip: Mention that for small k relative to n, the heap approach is optimal, but if k is close to n, sorting the entire array might be simpler and still efficient. Also, clarify that the output should be sorted descending, which requires an extra O(k log k) step.
Confirm the expected output format (sorted descending) and discuss edge cases like k=0, k>=n, or duplicate elements.
Select a min-heap of size k to maintain the k largest elements, ensuring O(n log k) time complexity.
For each element, if the heap has fewer than k elements, add it; otherwise, if the element is larger than the heap's minimum, replace the minimum.
After processing all elements, extract the k elements from the heap and sort them in descending order to produce the final output.
Explain that the time complexity is O(n log k) and space is O(k). Mention alternative approaches like quickselect for average O(n) time, but note that it doesn't guarantee sorted output.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.