← Snowflake Interview Insights
My first instinct was to sort both arrays and do prefix-skipping, which works, but I fumbled explaining why that's actually efficient.
Clarify the requirements and edge cases first, then propose a solution using a trie or hash set for efficient prefix matching. Walk through the algorithm, handle duplicates and trailing slashes, and analyze time and space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that you would normalize paths by removing trailing slashes and deduplicating inputs before processing, as this simplifies the core algorithm and avoids redundant work.
Ask about input size, whether paths are absolute or relative, how to handle duplicates, trailing slashes, and empty strings. Confirm the expected output format.
Decide between a trie (for prefix matching) and a hash set (for exact matching). Explain trade-offs: trie uses more memory but allows efficient prefix checks; hash set is simpler but requires checking all prefixes.
Normalize paths, build a trie of delete paths, then traverse each input path to see if it or any ancestor is marked for deletion. Collect surviving paths.
Address duplicates by deduplicating inputs, trailing slashes by normalizing, and ensure root path deletion works correctly. Consider case sensitivity if relevant.
State time complexity: O(N * L) where N is number of paths and L is average path length, assuming trie operations are O(L). Space complexity: O(M * L) for the trie, where M is number of delete paths.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.