← Google Interview Insights

Google·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

Senior
May 2026

Summary

Google ML Engineer interview with a tricky DP problem involving ad selection under a sliding window revenue constraint. Two variants made it more interesting than a typical knapsack rehash.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given a sequence of ads each with an associated revenue, select a subset of ads to maximize total revenue such that the sum of revenues in any consecutive T time units stays below a threshold M. Solve both the case where each ad can be selected at most once, and the case where ads can be reused.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The two-variant structure is what got me.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem constraints and define the objective function. Then, model the problem as a dynamic program where the state captures the last T-1 selections to enforce the sliding window constraint. For the reusable case, recognize it as a variant of the unbounded knapsack with window constraints and discuss potential optimizations like greedy with priority queues or linear programming relaxations.

Pro tip: Emphasize the trade-offs between exact DP solutions and scalable heuristics, especially for large-scale ad serving systems where real-time constraints matter. Mention that in practice, you might use a sliding window with a heap to maintain top candidates, but be aware of the optimality gap.

1. Clarify and Formalize

Restate the problem: given a sequence of ads with revenues, select a subset such that in any window of T consecutive time units, the sum of revenues of selected ads is < M. For the reusable case, ads can be selected multiple times. Define variables and constraints clearly.

2. Dynamic Programming Formulation

For the at-most-once case, define DP state as the last T-1 decisions (selected or not) to enforce the window constraint. Transition by considering selecting the current ad or not, updating the window sum. For the reusable case, the state remains similar but transitions allow multiple selections of the same ad, possibly leading to an unbounded knapsack-like DP.

3. Analyze Complexity and Optimizations

Discuss the time and space complexity: O(n * 2^(T-1)) for the at-most-once case, which is exponential in T. For large T, consider alternative approaches like greedy with a max-heap or linear programming. For the reusable case, note that the problem may be NP-hard in general, but for small T or special cases, DP works.

4. Consider Practical Trade-offs

In a real-world ad serving system, exact solutions may be infeasible due to scale. Discuss heuristics: e.g., greedy selection based on revenue density, or using a sliding window to maintain a set of candidates and selecting the highest revenue ad that doesn't violate the constraint. Mention that for the reusable case, one might use a priority queue to repeatedly select the best ad until the constraint is tight.

5. Evaluate and Extend

Compare the DP solution with heuristics in terms of optimality and runtime. Discuss potential extensions: non-uniform window sizes, multiple constraints, or online arrival of ads. Conclude with a recommendation based on the problem scale and requirements.

Key Points to Mention

  • Dynamic programming with state representing the last T-1 selections to enforce the sliding window constraint.
  • The at-most-once case is a 0/1 knapsack variant with window constraints, solvable in O(n * 2^(T-1)) time.
  • The reusable case is an unbounded knapsack variant, which may be NP-hard; discuss approximations or special cases.
  • Trade-offs between exact DP and scalable heuristics like greedy with priority queues.
  • Real-world considerations: online ad serving, latency constraints, and the need for real-time decisions.
  • Potential use of linear programming relaxations or Lagrangian methods for large-scale instances.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.