← Goldman Sachs Interview Insights
I knew the sliding window approach going in, so the main part was fine.
Use a sliding window with a hash map to track the last seen index of each character, expanding the right pointer and shrinking the left pointer when a duplicate is found. This yields O(n) time and O(min(n, alphabet)) space. For the follow-up, maintain the start index of the current longest window and extract the substring at the end.
Pro tip: At Goldman Sachs, interviewers value clean, efficient code and clear communication. Before coding, briefly explain the brute-force O(n^2) approach and why the sliding window improves it, then discuss edge cases like empty strings and all unique characters.
Ask clarifying questions: character set (ASCII/Unicode), case sensitivity, and expected input size. Confirm return type for follow-up (substring vs. length).
Mention the naive O(n^2) approach checking all substrings, then propose the sliding window with a hash map for O(n) time.
Initialize left=0, max_len=0, and a map char->last_index. Iterate right from 0 to n-1; if char in map and map[char] >= left, update left = map[char]+1. Update max_len and record start index if needed.
Maintain start and end indices of the longest window. After the loop, return s.substring(start, start+max_len) if asked for the substring.
Walk through edge cases: empty string, single character, all duplicates, all unique. State time O(n) and space O(min(n, alphabet)).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.