← Microsoft Interview Insights
Started with a regex and the interviewer just kind of waited.
Start by clarifying the JSON specification and constraints, then outline a two-phase approach: a tokenizer that converts the input string into a stream of tokens, and a recursive descent parser that validates the token sequence against JSON grammar. Walk through the design for each component, highlighting how you handle edge cases like trailing commas, unterminated strings, and recursion depth, and discuss trade-offs between iterative and recursive parsing.
Pro tip: Mention that you would use an explicit stack or depth counter to avoid stack overflow on deeply nested structures, and that you'd validate numbers strictly according to JSON spec (no leading zeros, no hex, etc.) to show attention to detail.
Ask whether the function should return a boolean or throw errors, and confirm the JSON specification version (e.g., RFC 8259). Discuss input size limits and recursion depth expectations.
Explain how to scan the string character by character, producing tokens for structural characters, strings (handling escape sequences), numbers, and literals (true, false, null). Mention skipping whitespace and detecting invalid characters.
Describe a recursive descent parser that consumes tokens and validates the grammar: value can be object, array, string, number, boolean, or null. For objects and arrays, handle nested structures and enforce correct comma/colon placement.
Discuss how to detect trailing commas (by checking token sequence), unterminated strings (by ensuring closing quote), and recursion depth (by using an explicit stack or depth limit). Also cover invalid escapes, leading zeros in numbers, and duplicate keys.
Compare recursive vs iterative parsing, tokenizer vs single-pass parsing, and error reporting strategies. Mention potential optimizations like early termination and memory usage considerations.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.