I started rattling off metrics which felt okay at first, DAU posting rate, views per story, completion rate, time spent.
Start by clarifying the comparison goal—are we evaluating engagement, retention, or business impact? Then propose a rigorous framework that aligns metrics with objectives, uses causal inference methods like A/B testing or quasi-experiments, and accounts for platform differences and network effects.
Pro tip: Acknowledge that direct comparison is tricky due to different user bases and contexts; suggest normalizing metrics or using propensity score matching to create comparable groups, showing you understand real-world constraints.
Clarify what 'success' means for each product (e.g., user engagement, retention, ad revenue) and align with Meta's strategic goals. Establish primary and secondary metrics.
Choose quantitative metrics such as DAU/MAU, time spent per user, stories created/viewed per user, completion rate, and retention. Ensure metrics are comparable across platforms.
If possible, run an A/B test by randomly assigning users to see one format over the other. If not, use quasi-experimental methods like difference-in-differences or propensity score matching to control for confounders.
Apply statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, bootstrapping) to compare metrics, check for significance, and validate with sensitivity analyses. Consider segment-level differences.
Synthesize findings into actionable insights, acknowledging limitations and suggesting next steps for product improvement or further research.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.