← Amazon Interview Insights

Amazon·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jun 2026

Summary

Amazon SWE coding round, one meaty dedup problem that kept growing the longer we talked. The core question wasn't too bad but the parallelism follow-up is where things got interesting.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given a list of events where each event has an ID and a timestamp, deduplicate the list so that only the most recent occurrence of each event ID is kept. Walk through your approach, edge cases, and how you'd handle a parallelized version across multiple workers.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Started with sorting by timestamp and building a map from event ID to the latest event seen.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., input size, memory limits, whether timestamps are unique) and then propose a hash map-based solution that keeps the latest timestamp per ID. Walk through the algorithm, discuss edge cases, and then extend to a parallelized version using partitioning and local deduplication followed by a global merge.

Pro tip: Emphasize the trade-offs between time and space complexity, and proactively mention how you would handle ties or out-of-order events. For the parallel version, highlight the importance of partitioning by ID to avoid cross-worker conflicts and ensure correctness.

1. Clarify Requirements and Constraints

Ask about input size, memory limits, timestamp uniqueness, and whether the list is sorted. This shows you think before coding and helps tailor the solution.

2. Propose a Single-Threaded Solution

Use a hash map to store the latest event per ID, iterating through the list and updating if the timestamp is newer. Discuss time O(n) and space O(k) where k is unique IDs.

3. Discuss Edge Cases and Trade-offs

Cover cases like duplicate timestamps, empty input, large data that doesn't fit in memory, and alternative approaches (e.g., sorting). Mention trade-offs between time, space, and simplicity.

4. Design a Parallelized Version

Partition events by ID across workers, each worker deduplicates locally, then merge results by comparing timestamps. Discuss load balancing, fault tolerance, and communication overhead.

5. Summarize and Validate

Recap the approach, complexity, and parallel design. Suggest testing with small and large datasets, and mention potential optimizations like using a combiner.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map for O(1) average lookup and update
  • Time and space complexity analysis
  • Handling duplicate timestamps (e.g., keep any or use event ID as tiebreaker)
  • Partitioning strategy for parallelism (e.g., hash partitioning by event ID)
  • Fault tolerance and handling stragglers in distributed setting
  • Alternative approaches like sorting by timestamp and using a set

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.