I spent the first few minutes just trying to understand what 'visible' meant here.
First, clarify the traversal definition and edge cases, then design an algorithm that computes the leftmost visible nodes from bottom-left to root and the rightmost visible nodes from root to bottom-right, merging them without duplicates. Use depth-first search to collect nodes at each depth, ensuring O(n) time and O(h) space, and analyze complexity.
Pro tip: Explicitly discuss how you handle the root node to avoid duplication, and mention that the traversal order depends on the definition of 'visible'—confirm with the interviewer if it means the first/last child at each depth.
Restate the traversal in your own words, ask clarifying questions about 'visible' nodes, and identify edge cases like single node, skewed tree, and duplicate handling.
Plan a two-phase approach: first, traverse from bottom-left to root collecting leftmost nodes per depth; second, traverse from root to bottom-right collecting rightmost nodes per depth, skipping the root in the second phase.
Implement a DFS that records the first node encountered at each depth for the left side, and another DFS that records the last node encountered at each depth for the right side, then concatenate the results.
State that the algorithm visits each node once, so time complexity is O(n), and space complexity is O(h) for recursion stack plus O(h) for storing the boundary nodes, where h is the tree height.
Walk through a small example and edge cases to verify correctness, ensuring no duplicates and proper ordering.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.