← Amazon Interview Insights

Amazon·Machine Learning Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
May 2026Remote

Summary

Amazon MLE loop, first technical round. The whole session was a single four-part Morse code problem that escalated from basic encoding all the way to full backtracking enumeration. Pacing was the real challenge, not the algorithms themselves.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Given a string of letters, output its Morse code representation. Then, given a Morse string with delimiters between characters, recover the original text.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Parts 1 and 2 are basically table lookup plus a split call.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the encoding and decoding requirements, including the delimiter used and whether the Morse code is standard. Then, implement a bidirectional mapping between letters and Morse code, and handle edge cases such as spaces and invalid input. For decoding, split the Morse string by the delimiter and map each code back to its corresponding letter.

Pro tip: Mention that Morse code is not a prefix code, so decoding without delimiters is ambiguous; always confirm the delimiter. Also, discuss how to handle spaces between words, often represented by a different delimiter like '/'.

1. Clarify requirements and assumptions

Ask about the delimiter between Morse characters (e.g., space) and between words (e.g., '/'), and whether the input is case-sensitive. Confirm if the Morse code is standard ITU.

2. Build the mapping

Create a dictionary mapping each letter (A-Z) to its Morse code and vice versa. Include digits and punctuation if needed.

3. Implement encoding

Iterate over each character in the input string, convert to uppercase, look up its Morse code, and join with the character delimiter. Use a different delimiter for spaces between words.

4. Implement decoding

Split the Morse string by the word delimiter first, then split each word by the character delimiter. Map each Morse code back to its letter and join to form the original text.

5. Test and handle edge cases

Test with empty strings, lowercase input, spaces, and invalid Morse codes. Discuss error handling for unknown characters.

Key Points to Mention

  • Standard Morse code mapping for letters, digits, and punctuation
  • Delimiter conventions: space between Morse characters, '/' between words
  • Case insensitivity: convert input to uppercase before encoding
  • Handling spaces in the original text during encoding and decoding
  • Ambiguity in decoding without delimiters due to non-prefix property
  • Time and space complexity: O(n) for both encoding and decoding

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Given a vocabulary and a continuous Morse string with no delimiters, recover the single source word that produced it.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where it got interesting.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Treat this as a segmentation problem: use dynamic programming to determine if the Morse string can be partitioned into valid Morse codes from the vocabulary, then reconstruct the unique word. Discuss the DP state, transition, and how to handle potential ambiguity by checking for multiple valid segmentations.

Pro tip: Clarify whether the vocabulary is a set of words or Morse codes, and whether the Morse string is guaranteed to have exactly one valid segmentation. This shows you think about edge cases and problem constraints before coding.

1. Clarify the problem

Confirm that the vocabulary contains words, each with a known Morse encoding, and that the input is a continuous Morse string with no delimiters. Ask if the solution should return the word or indicate ambiguity.

2. Define DP state and recurrence

Let dp[i] be true if the prefix of length i can be segmented into valid Morse codes. For each i, check all j < i such that the substring from j to i matches a Morse code in the vocabulary, and dp[j] is true.

3. Reconstruct the word

During DP, store the index of the previous split and the corresponding word. After filling dp, backtrack from the end to build the source word.

4. Handle ambiguity and complexity

If multiple segmentations exist, discuss how to detect and handle them (e.g., return any, or indicate ambiguity). Analyze time complexity: O(n * m) where n is Morse string length and m is max Morse code length.

5. Test and optimize

Walk through a small example, consider edge cases (empty string, no valid segmentation), and mention possible optimizations like using a trie for Morse codes to speed up matching.

Key Points to Mention

  • Dynamic programming for segmentation
  • Time and space complexity analysis
  • Handling ambiguity and uniqueness
  • Using a trie or hash map for efficient Morse code lookup
  • Reconstruction of the source word via backtracking
  • Edge cases: empty input, no valid segmentation, multiple valid words

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Extend the previous decoder to enumerate every possible sequence of vocabulary words whose concatenated Morse equals the input string, using backtracking.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

The interviewer mentioned after the round that most candidates don't reach this part, which made me feel slightly better about my shaky implementation.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem: given a Morse code string and a mapping from Morse codes to vocabulary words, find all sequences of words whose concatenated Morse equals the input. Then, design a backtracking algorithm that recursively tries each possible word at each position, pruning when no word matches the remaining prefix. Finally, discuss complexity, optimization (e.g., memoization, trie), and trade-offs.

Pro tip: Mention that you would use a trie or hash map for efficient lookup of Morse codes to words, and that memoization can avoid redundant exploration of suffixes, especially if the vocabulary is large.

1. Clarify the problem and constraints

Confirm the input format, the Morse-to-word mapping, and whether words can be reused. Ask about the expected size of input and vocabulary to guide optimization.

2. Design the backtracking algorithm

At each index in the Morse string, try every vocabulary word whose Morse code matches the substring starting at that index. Recursively proceed from the next index, accumulating the current sequence.

3. Optimize with data structures

Preprocess the vocabulary into a trie keyed by Morse code or a hash map from Morse code to list of words. This allows O(1) or O(L) lookup per word, where L is the word's Morse length.

4. Handle complexity and pruning

Analyze time complexity: O(N * W * L) worst-case, where N is input length, W is vocabulary size, L is max word length. Use memoization to cache results for suffixes to avoid recomputation.

5. Discuss trade-offs and extensions

Compare backtracking with dynamic programming. Mention that if only the count is needed, DP is more efficient; if all sequences are required, backtracking with memoization is suitable. Also discuss space complexity and potential for iterative deepening.

Key Points to Mention

  • Backtracking with recursion and state (current index, current sequence).
  • Preprocessing vocabulary into a trie or hash map for fast Morse code lookup.
  • Pruning: stop early if no word matches the remaining prefix.
  • Memoization to cache results for suffixes and avoid redundant work.
  • Time and space complexity analysis, including worst-case scenarios.
  • Trade-offs between backtracking and dynamic programming for enumeration vs. counting.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.